<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sicko Posters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2007/05/22/sicko-posters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2007/05/22/sicko-posters/</link>
	<description>Because we all like pretty pictures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Morford</title>
		<link>http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2007/05/22/sicko-posters/#comment-14056</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Morford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2007/05/22/sicko-posters/#comment-14056</guid>
		<description>In this grand pattern of things you actually secure  an A for hard work. Where you lost us ended up being on all the details. You know,  it is said, the devil is in the details... And it could not be more accurate here. Having said that, allow me tell you what did give good results. Your authoring is really persuasive and that is possibly why I am taking the effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, while I can see a leaps in logic you come up with, I am not necessarily convinced of exactly how you seem to unite the details that help to make the final result. For now I will, no doubt yield to your point but hope in the future you actually link your dots much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this grand pattern of things you actually secure  an A for hard work. Where you lost us ended up being on all the details. You know,  it is said, the devil is in the details&#8230; And it could not be more accurate here. Having said that, allow me tell you what did give good results. Your authoring is really persuasive and that is possibly why I am taking the effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, while I can see a leaps in logic you come up with, I am not necessarily convinced of exactly how you seem to unite the details that help to make the final result. For now I will, no doubt yield to your point but hope in the future you actually link your dots much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a301126</title>
		<link>http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2007/05/22/sicko-posters/#comment-12247</link>
		<dc:creator>a301126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2007/05/22/sicko-posters/#comment-12247</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said that least 301126 times.  The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said that least 301126 times.  The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
