http://www.answers.com/topic/dali-women-skull-jpg

The marketing team and the producers of the film don’t even credit this photograph, so I’d find it rather distasteful that they just rip it off. Aside from the woman on top, the poses are identical. Effectively used, perhaps, but certainly not original.

There is no such thing as ‘Weak’ that only applies if there is a standard that should be reached. An example is the Eistedfodd (a celebration of Welsh culture) it sometimes happens that no poem/song/exhibition/recital reaches the level demanded of 1st place and thus no 1st prize is awarded. To apply that to movie posters is ludicrise.

The Superman Returns poster is excellent the V for Vendetta almost looks like a NAZI propoganda poster.

Just my opinion…

The Hard Candy poster is my favorite btw.

* the judges have no art background — no validity to their judgement then in my opinion and the prize is meaningless.
* They recognise the copy and don’t care as the image is appropriate. A distinct possibility, after all the womans pose at the top is NOT different as claimed by another poster but there is a woman missing, the number of women being significant. In anycase, if submitting a barely altered piece of easily recognised art is rewarded with first place — the prize is meaningless.

Utter nonsense post modernist rubbish.

http://dali.uffs.net/galerie/pictures/1951_christ_of_saint_john_of_the_cross_01.jpg

In any case, that pose is Jesus-y.