Comments on: Star Trek? http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/01/star-trek/ Because we all like pretty pictures Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:25:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Jack Spectre http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/01/star-trek/#comment-10517 Jack Spectre Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:31:51 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2952#comment-10517 I love this poster. It's a great teaser for the movie, and promises a different experience. I love this poster. It’s a great teaser for the movie, and promises a different experience.

]]> By: Me http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/01/star-trek/#comment-9489 Me Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:43:24 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2952#comment-9489 I dont think it is anything.....other than an april fool. It does look like a golfer in a latex suit though. I dont think it is anything…..other than an april fool.
It does look like a golfer in a latex suit though.

]]> By: james ford http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/01/star-trek/#comment-9483 james ford Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:28:26 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2952#comment-9483 i feel bad for the paramount marketing. you guys may be throwing this poster under the bus but honestly, it's the best TREK poster since MOTION PICTURE. every TREK poster is the enterprise and kirk, spock, picard or data's bulbous head and the villain of the week. they're all really really lame, fairly interchangable and an example of the second rate status TREK has always been. NEMESIS was the highest budgeted film with $60m. meanwhile something like SIGNS the same year that dodges effects with "invisible space ships" costs $70m. whoever did this may have failed but at least they tried which is something can't say for the posters for the ten films that preceeded it. i feel bad for the paramount marketing. you guys may be throwing this poster under the bus but honestly, it’s the best TREK poster since MOTION PICTURE. every TREK poster is the enterprise and kirk, spock, picard or data’s bulbous head and the villain of the week. they’re all really really lame, fairly interchangable and an example of the second rate status TREK has always been. NEMESIS was the highest budgeted film with $60m. meanwhile something like SIGNS the same year that dodges effects with “invisible space ships” costs $70m.

whoever did this may have failed but at least they tried which is something can’t say for the posters for the ten films that preceeded it.

]]> By: Armando http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/01/star-trek/#comment-9482 Armando Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:26:45 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2952#comment-9482 There is no image, poster or marketing campaign that will make me want to see a Star Trek movie. There is no image, poster or marketing campaign that will make me want to see a Star Trek movie.

]]> By: John http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/01/star-trek/#comment-9478 John Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:42:26 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2952#comment-9478 I thought it was someone pushing through a plastic sheet. I thought it was someone pushing through a plastic sheet.

]]>