http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/28/alternate-poster-for-taking-woodstock/ Because we all like pretty pictures Thu, 16 May 2013 05:48:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/28/alternate-poster-for-taking-woodstock/#comment-9530 John Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:59:26 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2993#comment-9530 Hey there I'm the artist and just caught wind of the post - many thanks! Just to clarify :), I had the studio's full consent. Thanks again. Hey there
I’m the artist and just caught wind of the post – many thanks! Just to clarify , I had the studio’s full consent.
Thanks again.

]]> http://www.movieposteraddict.com/2009/04/28/alternate-poster-for-taking-woodstock/#comment-9528 Chris Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:41:42 +0000 http://www.movieposteraddict.com/?p=2993#comment-9528 I remember the topic of artists putting rejected comprehensives on their online portfolios came up when you had posted rejected comps of Jumper a few months back. In the case of Jumper, I thought it was okay for the artist to post his images to his portfolio because the movie had already been released. This movie doesn't come out for a few more months though, so unless he had the studios blessing, posting this image now displays poor judgment on the part of the artist. I know I'd think twice about hiring an artist who posts their comps to the internet while the campaign is still active. I remember the topic of artists putting rejected comprehensives on their online portfolios came up when you had posted rejected comps of Jumper a few months back. In the case of Jumper, I thought it was okay for the artist to post his images to his portfolio because the movie had already been released. This movie doesn’t come out for a few more months though, so unless he had the studios blessing, posting this image now displays poor judgment on the part of the artist. I know I’d think twice about hiring an artist who posts their comps to the internet while the campaign is still active.

]]>